|
While farming and ranching
are still the primary land uses of the Great Plains, urban areas
provide
housing and jobs for two-thirds of the region's people. Native ecosystems
and agricultural fields intermingle with small rural communities
and the
expanding metropolitan centers. The region produces much of the
nation's
grain, meat, and fiber, including over 60% of the wheat, 87% of
the
sorghum, and 36% of the cotton. The region is home to over 60% of
the
nation's livestock, including both grazing and grain-fed-cattle
operations. Recreation, wildlife habitat, and water resources are
also
found on the landscapes of the Great Plains. The Prairie Pothole
region
provides important habitat for migratory waterfowl. Surface water
in
rivers, streams, and lakes, and groundwater in aquifers provide
water for
urban, industrial, and agricultural uses, as well as riparian and
aquatic
ecosystems. Soil organic matter is a major resource of the Great
Plains as
it provides improved soil water retention, soil fertility, and
long-term
storage of carbon.
Climate determines many
aspects of life on the Plains. For agriculture, weather determines
the
planting and harvesting dates for crops, livestock grazing and
breeding
seasons, and water availability. The high natural variability of
climate
is a characterizing feature of the region. Farmers and ranchers
have
survived by being adaptive and incorporating new technologies to
buffer
their production against the variable climate. For urban centers,
the
availability of water often constrains urban and industrial
development.
Dams, diversions, channels, and groundwater pumping have
influenced nearly
all freshwater ecosystems in the region. Ongoing social and
economic
changes in the Great Plains will continue to increase demands on
the
region's land and water resources and challenge its physical and
social
infrastructure. Climate change will present additional challenges
to
long-term planning for new infrastructure and the sustainable use
of land
and water.
Observed Climate Trends
Across the Northern and
Central Great Plains, temperatures have risen more than 2F (1C)
in the
past century, with increases up to 5.5F (3C) in parts of
Montana,
North Dakota, and South Dakota. In the southern Great Plains, the
20th
century temperature record shows no trend. Over the last 100
years, annual
precipitation has decreased by 10% in eastern Montana, North
Dakota,
eastern Wyoming, and Colorado. In the eastern portion of the Great
Plains,
precipitation has increased by more than 10%. Texas has
experienced
significantly more high intensity rainfall. The snow season ends
earlier
in the spring, reflecting the greater seasonal warming in winter
and
spring.
Scenarios of Future
Climate
Climate model scenarios
project that temperatures will continue to rise throughout the
region,
with the largest increases in the western parts of the Plains. The
Canadian model projects greater increases throughout the region
than the
Hadley model. The climate model projections, as well as other
tools
utilized in analyzing impacts, include a greater number of heat
events --
three days in a row above 90F -- a major cause of heat stress
for
people and livestock. Seasonally, more warming is expected in
winter and
spring than in summer and fall. Precipitation generally increases
in the
region in the Hadley model, and in the northern parts in the
Canadian
model. Precipitation decreases in the lee of the Rocky Mountains
in both
models. This is accentuated in the Canadian model, with decreases
of up to
25% in an area centered on the Oklahoma panhandle and covering
northern
Texas, eastern Colorado, and western Kansas. Smaller decreases are
seen in
the Hadley model in a band from northern Texas through Montana.
Although
precipitation increases are projected for parts of the Great
Plains,
increased evaporation due to rising air temperatures are projected
to
surpass these increases, resulting in net soil moisture declines
for large
parts of the region.
|

|

|
Alteration in Timing and Amount of Water
Water supply, demand,
allocation, storage, and quality are all climate-sensitive issues
affecting the regional economy. Farming and ranching use over 50%
of the
region's water resources. Ground-water pumping for irrigation has
depleted aquifers in portions of the Great Plains by withdrawing
water
much faster than it can be recharged. Under today's irrigation
demands,
water table levels are thus dropping in parts of the southern
Great
Plains. The projected climate-induced changes in water resources
are
likely to exacerbate the current competition for water among the
agricultural sector, natural ecosystems, and urban, industrial,
and
recreational users.
Adaptations: It is
possible that current strategies to deal with drought, water
shortages,
extreme weather, and variability could help the region cope with
future
climate change impacts. These strategies include switching to
crops that
use less water, retiring marginal lands, adopting conservation
tillage,
and enhanced watershed storage capacity and groundwater recharge
activities. Water availability for crops could possibly be
improved using
new and existing technologies for crop residue management, wind
breaks,
mulches, soil carbon management, tillage practices, precision
agriculture,
and more efficient methods of water application. While these
strategies
would improve water use efficiency, adaptive strategies would also
need to
include maintaining water quality. Flexible policies and
institutions
would help to adapt to unanticipated hydrologic changes.
|

|
|
Water supplies for
agriculture have been decreasing in many parts of the Great
Plains,
partly due to increases in urban uses. Irrigation water needs
for grass
and alfalfa are projected to increase under both climate
scenarios while
those for corn rise slightly. The changes in irrigation needs
reflect
the seasonal shift in precipitation that favors corn more than
perennial
crops such as grass, hay, and alfalfa.
Lack of soil moisture can
greatly reduce yield of crops and forage. Under both climate
scenarios,
the consumptive demand for water on grass pasture increases more
than
50% while the water needs for irrigated corn change little.
Perennial
crops such as alfalfa experience an increase in consumptive demand for
water; the size of the increase depends on the climate scenario. |
Changes in Climate Extremes
Extreme climate and weather
events have major effects on urban and rural lives. The April 1997
flood
put approximately 90% of Grand Forks, North Dakota under water and
caused
over $1 billion in damages. A short-term heat wave in July 1995
caused the
deaths of over 4,000 feedlot cattle in Missouri. The severe
drought from
Fall 1995 through Summer 1996 in the agricultural regions of the
southern
Great Plains resulted in about $5 billion in damages. There is
some chance
that the projected increase in drought tendency in the Sand Hills
of the
Great Plains will result in expansion or shifting of sand dunes if
vegetation cover is not maintained. The potential for new patterns
in
climate extremes raises questions about the ability of current
coping
strategies to deal with future impacts.
Adaptations: Better
access to more accurate and timely information about near-term
weather
including extreme events, and longer-term forecasts could help
reduce risk
and uncertainty in decision making. For example, heat stress
events are
projected to occur more often in the central and southern Great
Plains in
the future. This information can help intensive-livestock
operators weigh
strategic decisions about investments in cooling systems.
Real-time
weather information can prepare them to implement an immediate
response to
cool their animals.
Invasive Species Effects on Economy and Ecology
The native grasslands,
shrublands, forests, and riparian ecosystems of the Great Plains
are home
to a variety of plants and animals. Nearly 60% of the bird species
that
breed in the US do so in the Great Plains. Agriculture and urban
development have disrupted these native ecosystems, and invasive
species
are currently a serious challenge in both native ecosystems and
agricultural systems. For example, leafy spurge currently reduces
grazing
capacity on grasslands. Field bindweed lowers crop production in
Kansas by
$40 million a year. Projected climate change is likely to alter
the
current biodiversity. A possible migration of invasive species
across the
Great Plains is a concern to stakeholders because the rapid rate
of
climate change is likely to be disadvantageous to native species.
The
exact social costs will depend upon the particular invasive
species or
type of change in biodiversity.
Adaptations:
Effective coping strategies would help provide plants and animals
with
habitats for adaptation such as maintaining a diversity of
vegetation
types and connectivity between the types. Preserving intact
riparian
areas, wetlands, and natural areas is likely to slow or reduce
future
invasions and is beneficial even in the absence of climate change.

Stress on Human Communities
Rural communities, already
stressed by their declining populations and shrinking economic
base, are
dependent on the competitive advantage of their agricultural
products in
domestic and foreign markets. Large corporate enterprises, the
result of
agribusiness modernization and consolidation, have greater
resources and
technology with which to buffer themselves against both economic
and
climatic variability. Thus, a changing climate is an additional
stress
that disproportionately impacts family farmers and ranchers. In
urban
communities, the impacts of floods, heat waves, and other climate
events
is a crucial emerging issue with significant economic
implications. Many
poorer people can not afford air conditioning, insulation,
substantial
housing, and other means of coping with climate extremes.
Therefore,
climate change impacts will vary significantly by social and
economic
status.
Adaptations:
Diversification within enterprises and rural communities could
help to
reduce risk and cope with the additional stress of climate change.
Community-level dialogue is vital in identifying information
needed by
managers and in assessing policy options for climate change.

Conservation of Soil Organic Matter
Soil carbon is vital for
retaining water and nutrients. The amount of carbon stored in the
soil is strongly influenced by past and present land management
practices
and weather patterns. Overall, soil carbon is projected to
decline
in response to higher temperatures in both climate scenarios. In
some areas, climate changes reduce the decomposition of soil
organic
matter, resulting in increased soil carbon.
|
Increasing Soil
Carbon Helps Buffer Against Climate Change Impacts |
|

|
|
Martin Kleinschmit, a
farmer and rancher in Bow Valley, Nebraska, says that
farmers have a
lot at risk as global climate heats up, but they also have a
lot to
gain by participating in the solution to climate change. By
conserving soil organic matter, farmers can improve soil
health and
productivity as well as capture and store (sequester) carbon
in the
extensive crop and rangelands of the Great Plains. The
higher
temperatures and greater numbers of droughts and floods
projected
for the region could threaten crops, raise production
expenses, and
increase the risk of failure. To protect our food supply,
healthy
soils able to withstand erratic weather patterns are needed.
Increasing the carbon
content of the soil will help to mitigate global warming by
keeping
carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, but it will do even
more to
buffer the soil against the threats of climate change.
Presently,
most US farmland has only half or less of its historical
level of
organic matter. Soil scientists have established that a
6-inch (15
cm) block of soil with 1 to 2% organic matter can hold only
about
one inch (2.5 cm) of rain before it runs out the bottom.
With 4 to
5% organic matter, that same soil can hold 4-6 inches (10 to
15 cm)
of rain before it leaves the root zone and takes with it the
water-soluble nutrients. Increasing soil organic matter also
reduces
the risks of flooding and erosion, and retains moisture
longer so
plants have access to it during periods of dry weather. Soil
organic
matter lessens the need for (and expense of) irrigation,
reduces
ground water pollution, and reduces the amount of run-off,
lessening
the threat of stream pollution. It also lowers the cost of
fertilization since nutrients not lost to erosion and
leaching need
not be replaced. Agricultural incentives that encourage net
carbon
sequestration in soil provide an opportunity to promote food
security in a changing climate and reduce the threat of
climate
change at the same time. |
|