| Overview of Emissions Scenarios and GCMs |
|
|
|
Simulations used for the U.S. National Assessment 1. CGCM1 Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis (CCCma): First generation Coupled General Circulation Model (CGCM1) Simulations:
Optional additional scenarios for the National Assessment (1 run each).
time series: 1850, scenarios start 1990
2. HADCM2 United Kingdom Meteorological Office/ Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research: HADCM2 Simulations:
1 control simulation time series: 1860, scenarios start 1990 3. ECHAM4/OPYC3
4. NCAR
CSM (Climate System Model)
These scenarios (1 run each) are run from 1980-2100, and they don't start diverging until after 2010. NCAR also has run a 20th century scenario (from 1870-1998) and an unforced control, but these simulations are not publicly available.
DOE PCM (Department of Energy Parallel Climate Model, at NCAR)
Emission Scenarios
Figure
1a: The 1% equivalent CO2 increase per year case is
scenario IS92a before present and 1% per year compounded increase of CO2
into the future. Equivalent CO2 is a way of increasing
the CO2 concentration to account for the radiative effects of
the other greenhouse gases (N2O, CH4, O3,
Halogenated compounds). The figure shows IS92a for CO2
alone (red) and equivalent CO2 (black). The CO2
concentration by 2100 is about 700 ppmv, but increases to about 1050 ppmv
when the effects of the other greenhouse gases are included. The 1%
increase per year scenario (blue) leads to a slightly larger increase than
the IS92a equivalent CO2 scenario, resulting in around 1250
ppmv by 2100. The 0.5% equivalent CO2 increase per year
case is actually just IS92d. The CO2 alone concentration
for IS92d (light blue) results in 540 ppmv by 2100, whereas the equivalent
CO2 (green) case actually used in the scenarios results in 730
ppmv CO2 by 2100. These concentrations were calculated
from the radiative forcings developed for IPCC from upwelling diffusion
energy balance models (T. Wigley, personal communication), using the
radiative forcing functions in IPCC Technical Paper II (Houghton
et al., 1997).
Fig
For a complete description of the NCAR CSM forcing scenarios, go to NCAR CSM. Note: The CGCM1 experiments used the same forcing as the HADCM2 experiments (for the 1% case).
References Houghton, J. T., Filho, L. G. M., Griggs, D. J., and K. Maskell, Eds., 1997, An introduction to simple climate models used in the IPCC second assessment report, IPCC, 47 pp. Langner, J. and H. Rodhe, 1991, "A global three-dimensional model of the tropospheric sulfur cycle", J. Atmos. Chem., 13, 225-263. Mitchell, J. F. B. and T. C. Johns, 1997, "On modification of global warming by sulfate aerosols", J. Climate, 10(2): 245-267. Shine, K.
P. , Derwent, R. G., Wuebbles, D. J., and J. J. Morcrette, 1990, "Radiative
forcing of climate", Climate Change. The IPCC Scientific
Assessment, J. T. Houghton, G. J. Jenkins, and J. J. Ephraums, Eds.,
Cambridge University Press, 41-68. |



















