With Climate Change, Longer, Stronger Pollen Seasons
A series of studies by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and academic institutions offers accumulating evidence that
Carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere directly affects plants by supplying the carbon they need for photosynthesis. In some cases, elevated CO2 levels can help plants grow fastera potential boon when that plant is an agriculturally important species.
But as USDA and other scientists pointed out in a 2009 Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) study, CO2 does not discriminate between desirable and undesirable plants. That means that while there may be benefits to faster-growing species like forest trees, for example, there can be serious negative consequences when these growth spurts occur in other plants, like ragweeda plant to which at least ten percent of the U.S. population is sensitive.
Some studies suggest that carbon-induced growth increases may be especially great in some pest plant species. The U.S.
Its also been shown that higher atmospheric CO2 levels as well as warmer temperatures two key aspects of climate changemay be contributing to the intensification of pollen seasons. A recent field study, for example, found that both factors significantly influence pollen production in common ragweed and can increase pollen concentrations in the atmosphere.
Other science tells us that some plant species are not only producing more pollen, but are also doing so over longer periods of timean effect thats already being seen on the ground. In a recent study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USDA researchers and others found that in parts of North America, the ragweed pollen season is up to three weeks longer than it was in the mid-1990s because of climate change.
This finding is just one demonstration that plants respond to climate change in ways that are likely to affect people, said Dr. Lewis Ziska, a scientist at USDA's Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and author of the PNAS study.
We study these aspects of plant responsefrom weeds, to wheat, to cellulosic biofuelsso that growers can continue to effectively provide our supply of food, feed, fiber and fuel, and so that citizens and health professionals can predict and deal with health impacts in the face of climatic
While the magnitude of climate-change impact on allergic disease is not yet known, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and other research institutions suggest that there could be a substantial effect.
These documented increases in pollen exposures are one of the clearest examples of how a changing climate is already affecting the health of people in the United States," said Dr. John Balbus, Senior Advisor for Public Health at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, adding that other climate-induced
"Just as trees and weeds respond to a changing climate, so too do ticks, mosquitoes, and other carriers of human diseases, making it critical that we anticipate all these changing patterns of disease and protect those most vulnerable."
Today, allergic disorders, including asthma, comprise the 6th leading cause of chronic illness in the Nation. They affect more than 50 million Americans per year and cost the United States nearly $20 billion annually. Given the number of studies documenting and projecting longer and more intense pollen seasons as a result of increasing temperatures and CO2 levels, we can expect those impacts and costs to grow even larger if the Nation and the world do not address climate change aggressively.
To learn more about climate change and allergens, please visit: http://www.cdc.gov/climatechange/effects/allergens.htm
To learn more about the health impacts of climate change, visit: http://www.niehs.nih.gov/about/od/programs/climatechange/health_impacts/asthma/index.cfm
Tala Karadsheh is a Communications Specialist at the U.S. Global Change Research Program